How Should We Rate Research? The UK's Current System Can Be Improved but Shouldn't Be Discarded

dc.creator	Hobbs, F.D. Richard	en
dc.creator	Stewart, Paul M.	en
dc.date.accessioned	2016-01-08T23:33:13Z	en
dc.date.available	2016-01-08T23:33:13Z	en
dc.date.created	2006-04-29	en
dc.date.issued	2006-04-29	en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	BMJ: British Medical Journal 2006 April 29; 332(7548): 983-984	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=How+should+we+rate+research?+The+UK's+current+system+can+be+improved+but+shouldn't+be+discarded&title=BMJ:+British+Medical+Journal+&volume=332&issue=7548&date=2006-04&au=Hobbs,+F.D.+Richard;+Stewart,+Paul+M.	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10822/973000	en
dc.format	Article	en
dc.language	en	en
dc.source	eweb:295971	en
dc.subject	Research	en
dc.subject.classification	Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards	en
dc.title	How Should We Rate Research? The UK's Current System Can Be Improved but Shouldn't Be Discarded	en
dc.provenance	Citation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.	en
dc.provenance	Citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.	en

Related items