The Groningen Protocol: Another Perspective
Journal of Medical Ethics 2006 March; 32(3): 157-158
The Groningen protocol allows for the euthanasia of severely ill newborns with a hopeless prognosis and unbearable suffering. We understand the impetus for such a protocol but have moral and ethical concerns with it. Advocates for euthanasia in adults have relied on the concept of human autonomy, which is lacking in the case of infants. In addition, biases can potentially influence the decision making of both parents and physicians. It is also very difficult to weigh the element of quality of life on the will to live. We feel an important line has been crossed if the international medical community consents to the active euthanasia of severely ill infants and are concerned about the extension of the policy to other at risk groups.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Jotkowitz, Alan; Glick, S.; Gesundheit, B. (2008-11)The Groningen Protocol allows active euthanasia of severely ill newborns with unbearable suffering. Defenders of the protocol insist that the protocol refers to terminally ill infants and that quality of life should not ...
The Groningen Protocol, Unfortunately Misunderstood. Commentary on Gesundheit Et Al.: The Groningen Protocol - the Jewish Perspective (Neonatology 2009;96:6-10) Sauer, Pieter J.J.; Verhagen, A.A. Eduard (2009)