When Psychiatry and Bioethics Disagree About Patient Decision Making Capacity (DMC)
Journal of Medical Ethics 2006 February; 32(2): 90-93
The terms "competency" and "decision making capacity" (DMC) are often used interchangeably in the medical setting. Although competency is a legal determination made by judges, "competency" assessments are frequently requested of psychiatrists who are called to consult on hospitalised patients who refuse medical treatment. In these situations, the bioethicist is called to consult frequently as well, sometimes as a second opinion or "tie breaker". The psychiatric determination of competence, while a clinical phenomenon, is based primarily in legalism and can be quite different from the bioethics approach. This discrepancy highlights the difficulties that arise when a patient is found to be "competent" by psychiatry but lacking in DMC by bioethics. Using a case, this dilemma is explored and guidance for reconciling the opinions of two distinct clinical specialties is offered.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Making Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Patients With Dementia: The Problem of Patient Decision-Making Capacity Derse, Arthur R. (1999-01)The problem of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia, such as those with early stage Alzheimer's, can be vexing, especially when these patients refuse life-sustaining medical treatments. However, these patients ...
Erlen, Judith A. (1995-07)Our society supports the right of its members to be self-determining and to make decisions based on their personal values and beliefs. However, what happens when a person lacks the capacity to make decisions? The ...