Keep People Informed or Leave Them Alone? A Suggested Tool for Identifying Research Participants Who Rightly Want Only Limited Information
Journal of Medical Ethics 2005 November; 31(11): 674-678
People taking part in research vary in the extent to which they understand information concerning their participation. Since they may choose to limit the time and effort spent on such information, lack of understanding is not necessarily an ethical problem. Researchers who notice a lack of understanding are in the quandary of not knowing whether this is due to flaws in the information process or to participants' deliberate choices. We argue that the two explanations call for different responses.A tool for identifying those research participants who want limited information is presented. This consists of a restricted number of questions about trust in and appraisal of research, priority of time and privacy, and perception of a duty to participate. It is argued that an important group of participants who purposely lack understanding of the study can be identified with this tool. Some limitations to this approach are also discussed.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
How to Handle Informed Consent in Longitudinal Studies When Participants Have a Limited Understanding of the Study Helgesson, Gert; Ludvigsson, J.; Gustafsson Stolt, U. (2005-11)Empirical findings from a Swedish longitudinal screening study show that many of the research subjects had a limited understanding of the study. Nevertheless they were satisfied with the understanding they had and found ...
Helgesson, Gert; Eriksson, Stefan; Swartling, Ulrica (2007-07)The right not to know personal health-related information has been included in prominent human rights documents and subsequently in national legislation since the middle of the 1990s. Apart from situations where another ...
Does Informed Consent Have an Expiry Date? A Critical Reappraisal of Informed Consent as a Process Helgesson, Gert; Eriksson, Stefan (2011-01)