The Ethics of Policy Writing: How Should Hospitals Deal With Moral Disagreement About Controversial Medical Practices?
Winkler, Eva C.
Journal of Medical Ethics 2005 October; 31(10): 559-566
Every healthcare organisation (HCO) enacts a multitude of policies, but there has been no discussion as to what procedural and substantive requirements a policy writing process should meet in order to achieve good outcomes and to possess sufficient authority for those who are asked to follow it.Using, as an example, the controversy about patient's refusal of blood transfusions, I argue that a hospital wide policy is preferable to individual decision making, because it ensures autonomy, quality, fairness, and efficiency.Policy writing for morally controversial medical practices needs additional justification compared to policies on standard medical practices and secures legitimate authority for HCO members by meeting five requirements: all parties directed by the policy are represented; the deliberative process encompasses all of the HCO's obligations; the rationales for the policy are made available; there is a mechanism for criticising, and for evaluating the policy.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Ethical Dimensions of Patient Drug Charges -- Scenario; Position 1: Pharmacist Should Accept Hospitals Pricing Policy or Resign; Position 2: Pharmacist Should Protest the Hospital's Pricing Policy; Analysis and Commentary; Selected Current Literature Citations on Ethics Uretsky, Samuel D.; Gouveia, William A.; Veatch, Robert M. (1990-10)
An 'Ethics Gap' in Writing About Bioethics: A Quantitative Comparison of the Medical and the Surgical Literature Paola, Frederick; Barten, Sharon S. (1995-04)In order to determine whether there is a significant difference between the medical literature and the surgical literature in terms of their bioethics content, we conducted a computerized search of the MEDLINE database. The ...