A Pilot Study of the Quality of Informed Consent Materials for Aboriginal Participants in Clinical Trials
Journal of Medical Ethics 2005 August; 31(8): 490-494
OBJECTIVE: To pilot informed consent materials developed for Aboriginal parents in a vaccine trial, and evaluate their design and the informed consent process. METHODS: Cross sectional quantitative and qualitative survey of 20 Aboriginal and 20 non- Aboriginal women in Alice Springs. Information about the proposed research was presented to Aboriginal participants by an Aboriginal researcher, using purpose designed verbal, visual, and written materials. Non-Aboriginal participants received standard materials developed by the sponsor. Questionnaires were used to evaluate recall and understanding immediately and five days later. Qualitative analysis of Aboriginal participants' interviews was performed. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in understanding of diseases prevented by the vaccine, the potential risks of participating, or the voluntary nature of participation. Most Aboriginal participants had difficulty with the concept of a "licensed" versus "unlicensed" vaccine. The non-Aboriginal group had a good understanding of this. Aboriginal participants identified the use of the flipchart, along with a presentation by a doctor and Aboriginal health worker, as preferred delivery modes. Group presentations were preferred rather than one-on-one discussions. The use of the questionnaire posed considerable methodological difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: A one-off oral presentation to Aboriginal participants is unlikely to produce "informed consent". Key but unfamiliar concepts require identification and particularly considered presentation.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Protecting Research Participants Review of Institutional Review Boards: Management and Function, Edited by R.J. Amdur and E.A. Bankert; Institutional Review Board: Member Handbook, by R. Amdur; Study Guide for Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, by S. Kornetsky, A. Davis, and R.J. Amdur; Principles of Clinical Research, Edited by I. Di Giovanna and G. Hayes; Informed Consent in Medical Research, Edited by L. Doyal and J.S. Tobias; the Complete Guide to Informed Consent in Clinical Trials, Edited by T. Hartnett; Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Edited by S.M. Reverby; European Neonatal Research: Consent, Ethics Committees and Law, Edited by S. Mason and C. Megone; the Ethics of Medical Research on Humans, by C. Foster; Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication, Edited by A. Hudson Jones and F. McLellan; Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research (3rd Edition), Edited by S. Lock, F. Wells, and M. Farthing; Biomedical Research Ethics: Updating International Guidel Nicholson, Richard (2002-11)
Pilot Study Demonstrating Effectiveness of Targeted Education to Improve Informed Consent Understanding in AIDS Clinical Trials Sengupta, Sohini; Lo, Bernard; Strauss, Ronald P; Eron, Joseph; Gifford, Allen L (2011-11)Assessing and improving informed consent understanding is equally important as obtaining consent from participants in clinical trial research, but developing interventions to target gaps in participants' informed consent ...
Quality of Informed Consent: Measuring Understanding Among Participants in Oncology Clinical Trials Barrett, Roseann (2005-07-01)