Show simple item record

dc.creatorRodriguez del Pozo, Pabloen
dc.creatorFins, Joseph J.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:41:30Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:41:30Zen
dc.date.created2005-07-01en
dc.date.issued2005-07-01en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC Medical Ethics [Online]. 2005 July 1; 6(6): 5 p. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6939-6-6.pdf [1 February 2006]en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Death,+dying+and+informatics:+misrepresenting+religion+on+MedLine&title=BMC+Medical+Ethics+&volume=&issue=&date=2005-07&au=Rodriguez+del+Pozo,+Pablo;+Fins,+Joseph+J.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://timetravel.mementoweb.org/memento/2005/http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6939-6-6.pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/980343en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The globalization of medical science carries for doctors worldwide a correlative duty to deepen their understanding of patients' cultural contexts and religious backgrounds, in order to satisfy each as a unique individual. To become better informed, practitioners may turn to MedLine, but it is unclear whether the information found there is an accurate representation of culture and religion. To test MedLine's representation of this field, we chose the topic of death and dying in the three major monotheistic religions. METHODS: We searched MedLine using PubMed in order to retrieve and thematically analyze fulllength scholarly journal papers or case reports dealing with religious traditions and end-of-life care. Our search consisted of a string of words that included the most common denominations of the three religions, the standard heading terms used by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature (NRCBL), and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used by the National Library of Medicine. Eligible articles were limited to English-language papers with an abstract. RESULTS: We found that while a bibliographic search in MedLine on this topic produced instant results and some valuable literature, the aggregate reflected a selection bias. American writers were over-represented given the global prevalence of these religious traditions. Denominationally affiliated authors predominated in representing the Christian traditions. The Islamic tradition was under-represented. CONCLUSION: MedLine's capability to identify the most current, reliable and accurate information about purely scientific topics should not be assumed to be the same case when considering the interface of religion, culture and end-of-life care.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:286430en
dc.subjectBioethicsen
dc.subjectCultureen
dc.subjectDeathen
dc.subjectDoctorsen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectMedicineen
dc.subjectMethodsen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPrevalenceen
dc.subjectReligionen
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.subject.classificationReligious Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationInformation Science Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationProlongation of Life and Euthanasiaen
dc.titleDeath, Dying and Informatics: Misrepresenting Religion on MedLineen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885