Show simple item record

dc.creatorHeitman, Elizabethen
dc.creatorBulger, Ruth Ellenen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:41:36Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:41:36Zen
dc.date.created2005-07en
dc.date.issued2005-07en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1080/08989620500217420en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAccountability in Research 2005 July-September; 12(3): 207- 224en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Assessing+the+educational+literature+in+the+responsible+conduct+of+research+for+core+content&title=Accountability+in+Research+&volume=12&issue=3&date=2005-07&au=Heitman,+Elizabeth;+Bulger,+Ruth+Ellenen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989620500217420en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/980499en
dc.description.abstractTo determine core content for RCR instruction, content analysis was conducted using key instructional resources for ORI's nine RCR "core instructional areas". Topics discussed in these key RCR resources were identified and their frequency across resources was tabulated. Topics covered most frequently were judged to be core content. Although key educational resources cited a variety of references, specific topics and issues addressed were generally consistent across the materials examined. Nonetheless, key resources varied in organization and depth of coverage for core instructional areas. Recent resources were more systematic and comprehensive than earlier works. This was particularly evident in materials about human participant research, conflicts of interest, and data management and sharing. Key resources presented additional "non-core" issues, such as scientific values, epidemiological issues, and scientists' societal roles, suggesting that ORI's core instructional areas should be reconfigured or expanded. Because educational material available on RCR and professionalism was so comprehensive, we recommend that ORI consider research integrity, not research misconduct, as one core instructional area. We also recommend that compliance with research regulations be restored as a core instructional area to accentuate ethical, financial and legal requirements related to acceptance of federal funding.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:286246en
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectMisconducten
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectValuesen
dc.subject.classificationSocial Control of Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.classificationEducation for Health Care Professionalsen
dc.subject.classificationScientific Research Ethicsen
dc.titleAssessing the Educational Literature in the Responsible Conduct of Research for Core Contenten
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885