Show simple item record

dc.creatorLoewy, Erich H.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:47:28Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:47:28Zen
dc.date.created2005en
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1007/s11017-005-2203-0en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2005; 26(6): 445-468en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=In+defense+of+paternalism&title=Theoretical+Medicine+and+Bioethics+&volume=26&issue=6&spage=445-468&date=2005&au=Loewy,+Erich+H.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-2203-0en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/985858en
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that we have wrongly and not for the patient's benefit made a form of stark autonomy our highest value which allows physicians to slip out from under their basic duty which has always been to pursue a particular patient's good. In general - I shall argue - it is the patient's right to select his or her own goals and the physician's duty to inform the patient of the feasibility of that goal and of the means needed to attain it. If the goal is not one that is possible, the patient, with the physician and family, must select a feasible goal and then discuss the costs/benefits of various approaches. The physician should take a leading role in helping the patient select the goal. I argue that to simply present a laundry list of means and insist that patients choose for themselves is not only abandoning patients to their autonomy but is, in fact, a crass form of violating the patient's autonomy. Freely choosing not to choose is a choice a patient with decisional capacity is entitled to make and one that needs to be respected.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:279015en
dc.subjectAutonomyen
dc.subjectGoalsen
dc.subjectPaternalismen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophical Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationPatient Relationshipsen
dc.subject.classificationHealth Careen
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy of Medicineen
dc.titleIn Defense of Paternalismen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885