Respect: Or, How Respect for Persons Became Respect for Autonomy
Lysaught, M. Therese
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2004 December; 29(6): 665- 680
This article provides an intellectual archeology of how the term "respect" has functioned in the field of bioethics. I argue that over time the function of the term has shifted, with a significant turning point occurring in 1979. Prior to 1979, the term "respect" connoted primarily the notion of "respect for persons" which functioned as an umbrella which conferred protection to autonomous persons and those with compromised autonomy. But in 1979, with the First Edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics by Beauchamp and Childress, and the report of the Ethical Advisory Board (EAB) of the (then) Department of Health, Education, and Welfare entitled Research on In Vitro Fertilization, usage shifts from "respect for persons" to "respect for autonomy." Two results: 1) those with compromised autonomy are no longer protected by the canons of "respect" but rather the less overriding canons of beneficence; and 2) the term "respect" functions increasingly as a rhetorical device in public bioethics discourse.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Woods, Simon (2005)This paper explores some of the values that underpin health care and how these relate more specifically to the values and ethics of palliative care. The paper focuses on the concept of autonomy because autonomy has emerged ...
Barilan, Y. Michael; Weintraub, Moshe (2001-02)
Chase, Gary A.; DeLeon, Patricia A.; Dronamraju, Krishna R.; Erickson, Robert P.; Glorioso, Joseph C.; Hirschhorn, Rochelle; Lysaught, M. Therese; McGraw, Kathleen M.; Meyers, Abbey S.; Miller, A. Dusty; Ross, Gail S.; Rothenberg, Karen H.; Saha, Bratin K.; Secundy, Marian G.; Straus, Stephen E. (1995-07-07)