Quality of Life: The Contested Rhetoric of Resource Allocation and End-of-Life Decision Making
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2004 December; 29(6): 651- 664
The term"quality of life" has a long history in the bioethics literature. It is usually used in one of two contexts: in resource allocation discussions in the hope of arriving at an objective measure of the worth of an intervention; and in end-of-life discussions as a concept that can justify the forgoing of life- sustaining treatment. In both contexts, the term has valid uses as it is meant to measure the efficacy of a treatment. However, the term has the unfortunate rhetorical problem that it often seems to be a judgment on the life of a human being. As such, it is highly inflammatory. We suggest that a return to a rhetoric that suggests a judgment on the treatment rather than the person is needed.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision Making Caro, J Jaime; DeRenzo, Evan G; Coleman, C Norman; Weinstock, David M; Knebel, Ann R (2011-03)This article provides practical ethical guidance for clinicians making decisions after a nuclear detonation, in advance of the full establishment of a coordinated response. We argue that the utilitarian maxim of the greatest ...