Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:00:53Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:00:53Zen
dc.date.created2004-03-26en
dc.date.issued2004-03-26en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFamily Law Reports 2004; 2004(2): 365-439en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/991722en
dc.description.abstractCourt Decision: [2004] 2 Family Law Reports 365; 2004 March 26 (date of decision). The Queen's Bench Division held that the practice of not warning parents of the possibility of post-mortem removal and retention of organs from their children violated the duty health care providers owed to the parents. Parents of three children, a premature baby, a stillborn infant, and a two year old toddler, brought suit against the hospital after the hospital removed and retained organs from their deceased children pursuant to proficiently performed post-mortems. The parents, upon discovery of this fact many years later, complained that the hospital had improperly retained possession of the organs and also had failed to inform them of this possibility. Although the court held that the parents had no possessory interest in the organs, which were removed and retained by the hospital pursuant to the standard post-mortem procedure, the court also found informed consent to be defective. The hospital's choice to omit the possibility of organ removal and retention from the parents' informed consent forms was motivated by paternalistic concern and violated its duty to the parents. [KIE/ECL]en
dc.formatCourt Decisionen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherGreat Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, Queen's Bench Divisionen
dc.sourceeweb:271480en
dc.subjectChildrenen
dc.subjectConsent Formsen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectFormsen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectInformed Consenten
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subjectParentsen
dc.subjectTrusten
dc.subject.classificationValue / Quality of Lifeen
dc.subject.classificationDonation / Procurement of Organs and Tissuesen
dc.subject.classificationMinors / Parental Consenten
dc.titleAB v. Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trusten
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885