Ethical Issues Concerning Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Miller, Franklin G.
Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Rosenstein, Donald L.
Straus, Stephen E.
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2004 February 4; 291(5): 599-604
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown dramatically in recent years, as has research on the safety and efficacy of CAM treatments. Minimal attention, however, has been devoted to the ethical issues relating to research on CAM. We argue that public health and safety demand rigorous research evaluating CAM therapies, research on CAM should adhere to the same ethical requirements for all clinical research, and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials should be used for assessing the efficacy of CAM treatments whenever feasible and ethically justifiable. In addition, we explore the legitimacy of providing CAM and conventional therapies that have been demonstrated to be effective only by virtue of the placebo effect.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Millea, Paul J.; Miller, Franklin G.; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Rosenstein, Donald L.; Straus, Stephen F. (2004-05-12)
Chen, Donna T.; Rosenstein, Donald L.; Muthappan, Palaniappan; Hilsenbeck, Susan G.; Miller, Franklin G.; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Wendler, David (2005-03-28)BACKGROUND: There is widespread disagreement about the type of consent needed for research with stored biological samples. Many believe consent for each future use is required to respect individuals. Others worry this ...
Miller, Franklin G.; Rosenstein, Donald L. (2002-10-26)Clinical investigators rarely describe the rationale for ethically controversial features of study design or procedures instituted to enhance the protection of patients taking part in research, or how they ensured informed ...