Conscientious Refusal and a Doctors's Right to Quit
Davis, John K.
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2004 February; 29(1): 75-91
Patients sometimes request procedures their doctors find morally objectionable. Do doctors have a right of conscientious refusal? I argue that conscientious refusal is justified only if the doctor's refusal does not make the patient worse off than she would have been had she gone to another doctor in the first place. From this approach I derive conclusions about the duty to refer and facilitate transfer, whether doctors may provide 'moral counseling,' whether doctors are obligated to provide objectionable procedures when no other doctor is available, why the moral consensus among doctors seems relevant even though it does not determine whether something is morally acceptable, and whether doctors should stay out of fields whose standard procedures they find morally unacceptable.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Davis, John K. (2008-08)Most discussions of medical futility try to answer the Futility Question: when is a medical procedure futile? No answer enjoys universal support. Some futility policies say that the health care provider will answer this ...
Harris, John; Davis, John A. (1983-12)The question of a doctor's moral obligation to do something for a patient was raised by G.E.M. Anscombe in a commentary on an article by John Harris, "Ethical problems in the management of some severely handicapped children," ...
Matas, Arthur J.; Arras, John; Muyskens, James; Tellis, Vivian; Veith, Frank J. (1985)To help overcome the shortage of organs for transplantation, the authors propose a legislative change that would institute a policy of routine salvaging of organs from brain dead patients unless the family objected or ...