Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes?
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2004; 25(3): 199-208
Respect for human embryos is often defended on the basis of the potentiality argument: embryos deserve respect because they already possess potentially the features that in adults are fully actualized. Opponents of this argument challenge it by claiming that if embryos should be respected because they are potentially adults, then gametes should be respected because they are potentially embryos. This article rejects this reductio ad absurdum argument by showing that there are two different types of potentiality involved so that the transitivity of potentiality does not hold up in this case. Respect for embryos does not logically entail respect for gametes.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Gomez-Lobo, Alfonso (2005)In order to understand the nature of human embryos I first distinguish between active and passive potentiality, and then argue that the former is found in human gametes and embryos (even in embryos in vitro that may fail ...
Gomez-Lobo, Alfonso (2004-03)This response to Nikolaus Knoepffler's paper in the same issue of the Journal agrees that if the arguments supporting the first two of the eight human embryonic stem cell research policy options discussed are unsound, as ...
Production of pluripotent stem cells by oocyte-assisted reprogramming: joint statement with signatories Cameron, Nigel M. de S.; FitzGerald, Kevin T.; Flannery, Kevin; Gomez-Lobo, Alfonso; Harvey, John Collins; Kilner, John F.; May, William E.; Williams, Thomas (2005-09)