Principlism or Narrative Ethics: Must We Choose Between Them?
Creator
McCarthy, J.
Bibliographic Citation
Medical Humanities 2003 December; 29(2): 65-71
Abstract
This paper addresses a current debate in the bioethics community between principlists, who consider that principles are at the heart of moral life, and narrativists, who see communication at its core. Using a case study entitled "The forgetful mourner" to introduce the tensions between each of these positions, I go on to explain the central tenets of both principlism and narrative ethics. Rather than focus on their respective weaknesses, which many theorists do, I emphasize instead, the contribution that each approach can make to understanding moral life situations. My ultimate aim is to identify the, sometimes overlapping, skills that both principlism and narrative ethics require on the part of health professionals who deploy them. I conclude that a good principlist has narrativist tendencies and a good narrativist in inclined toward principlism.
Date
2003-12Subject
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Review of DEFINING MOMENTS, WHEN MANAGERS MUST CHOOSE BETWEEN RIGHT and RIGHT
McInerney, Tom (1999-01) -
Must We Choose Between Quality and Cost Containment?
Carpenter, Caryl E.; Bender, A. Douglas; Nash, David B.; Cornman, John M. (1996-12) -
Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose Between Right and Right
Badaracco, Joseph L. (1997)