Show simple item record

dc.creatorSchneiderman, Lawrence J.en
dc.creatorGilmer, Todden
dc.creatorTeetzel, Holly D.en
dc.creatorDugan, Daniel O.en
dc.creatorBlustein, Jeffreyen
dc.creatorCranford, Ronalden
dc.creatorBriggs, Kathleen B.en
dc.creatorKomatsu, Glen I.en
dc.creatorGoodman-Crews, Paulaen
dc.creatorCohn, Feliciaen
dc.creatorYoung, Ernle W.D.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:08:32Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:08:32Zen
dc.date.created2003-09-03en
dc.date.issued2003-09-03en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1001/jama.290.9.1166en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2003 September 3; 290(9): 1166-1172en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Effect+of+ethics+consultations+on+nonbeneficial+life-+sustaining+treatments+in+the+intensive+care+setting&title=JAMA:+The+Journal+of+the+American+Medical+Association+&volume=290&issue=9&spage=1166-1172&date=2003-09&au=Schneiderman,+Lawrence+J.;+Gilmer,+Todd;+Teetzel,+Holly+D.;+Dugan,+Daniel+O.;+Blustein,+Jeffrey;+Cranford,+Ronald;+Briggs,+Kathleen+B.;+Komatsu,+Glen+I.;+Goodman-Crews,+Paula;+Cohn,+Felicia;+Young,+Ernle+W.D.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1166en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/997857en
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Ethics consultations increasingly are being used to resolve conflicts about life-sustaining interventions, but few studies have reported their outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ethics consultations in the intensive care setting reduce the use of life-sustaining treatments delivered to patients who ultimately did not survive to hospital discharge, as well as the reactions to the consultations of physicians, nurses, and patients/surrogates. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial from November 2000 to December 2002. SETTING: Adult intensive care units (ICUs) of 7 US hospitals representing a spectrum of institutional characteristics. PATIENTS: Five hundred fifty-one patients in whom value-related treatment conflicts arose during the course of treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned either to an intervention (ethics consultation offered) (n = 278) or to usual care (n = 273). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were ICU days and life-sustaining treatments in those patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. We examined the same measures in those who did survive to discharge and also compared the overall mortality rates of the intervention and usual care groups. We also interviewed physicians and nurses and patients/surrogates about their views of the ethics consultation. RESULTS: The intervention and usual-care groups showed no difference in mortality. However, ethics consultations were associated with reductions in hospital (-2.95 days, P =.01) and ICU (-1.44 days, P =.03) days and life-sustaining treatments (- 1.7 days with ventilation, P =.03) in those patients who ultimately did not survive to discharge. The majority (87%) of physicians, nurses, and patients/surrogates agreed that ethics consultations in the ICU were helpful in addressing treatment conflicts. CONCLUSION: Ethics consultations were useful in resolving conflicts that may have inappropriately prolonged nonbeneficial or unwanted treatments in the ICU.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:263286en
dc.subjectConsultationen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectEthics Consultationen
dc.subjectHospitalsen
dc.subjectIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectMortalityen
dc.subjectNursesen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subject.classificationEthics Committees / Consultationen
dc.subject.classificationProlongation of Life and Euthanasiaen
dc.titleEffect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life- Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care Settingen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885