Show simple item record

dc.creatorKim, Scott Y.H.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-09T00:08:52Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-09T00:08:52Zen
dc.date.created2003-09en
dc.date.issued2003-09en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1162/152651603322614689en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAmerican Journal of Bioethics 2003 Fall; 3(4): 68-70en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+sham+surgery+debate+and+the+moral+complexity+of+risk-+benefit+analysis&title=American+Journal+of+Bioethics+&volume=3&issue=4&spage=68-70&date=2003-09&au=Kim,+Scott+Y.H.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152651603322614689en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/998411en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:262591en
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subjectSurgeryen
dc.subject.classificationHuman Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boardsen
dc.subject.classificationResearch on Special Populationsen
dc.titleThe Sham Surgery Debate and the Moral Complexity of Risk- Benefit Analysisen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885