Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003 September; 13(3): 219-230
The fifth edition of Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics is distinguished by its emphatic embrace of common morality as the ultimate source of moral norms. This essay critically evaluates the fifth edition's discussion of common morality and, to a lesser extent, its treatment of coherence (both the model of ethical justification and the associated concept). It is argued that the book is overly accommodating of existing moral beliefs. The paper concludes with three suggestions for improving this leading text.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Karlsen, Jan Reinert; Solbakk, Jan Helge (2011-10)From the 5th edition of Beauchamp and Childress' Principles of Biomedical Ethics, the problem of common morality has been given a more prominent role and emphasis. With the publication of the 6th and latest edition, the ...
Herissone-Kelly, Peter (2011-10)Tom Beauchamp and James Childress have always maintained that their four principles approach (otherwise known as principlism) is a globally applicable framework for biomedical ethics. This claim is grounded in their belief ...
DeGrazia, David (2003-09)