Action v Inaction: A Case History in Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 2003 August; 29(4): 225-226
The motives behind the author's decision to resuscitate a patient are examined. This is prompted by the realisation that he ignored the man's apparent wish not to be saved for fear of criticism from both relatives and colleagues. The way in which decisions are made when the interests of the doctor and the patient clash are briefly explored. Self interest may play a more significant role than is commonly accepted.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
McNeill, Paul M. (2003-10)This paper is a case study in public health ethics. It considers whether there is a basis in ethics for political action by health professionals and their associations in response to inhumane treatment. The issue arises ...