Cryolife v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County
California Reporter, 3rd Series, 2003; 2: 396-408
Epitome: Court determined that tissue bank which supplied contaminated tissue for transplant could not be sued under products liability law because tissue banks, even for profit ones, sell services and not products, because the body is not property.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Unknown author (California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, 1978-05-25)
Unknown author (California. Court of Appeal. Sixth Appellate District, 1987-10-14)
Unknown author (California. Supreme Court, 2004-03-01)Court Decision: 85 Pacific Reporter, 3d Series 67; 2004 March 1 (date of decision). The California Supreme Court agreed with a lower court decision that the state's Women's Contraception Equity Act (WCEA) requires employers ...